Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2024

InglêsAspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects
Código
ce176270
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MMA
Ano
2024
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Analista Ambiental
Text CB1A8

        The idea of giving rights to animals has long been contentious, but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights advocates want to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public aware of the fact that animals are sensitive, emotional, and intelligent beings who deserve dignity and respect. But first, it’s important to understand what the term “animal rights” really means.
         Animal rights are moral principles grounded in the belief that non-human animals deserve the ability to live as they wish, without being subjected to the desires of human beings. At the core of animal rights is autonomy, which is another way of saying choice. In many countries, human rights are enshrined to protect certain freedoms, such as the right to expression, freedom from torture, and access to democracy. Of course, these choices are constrained depending on social locations like race, class, and gender, but generally speaking, human rights safeguard the basic tenets of what makes human lives worth living. Animal rights aim to do something similar, only for non-human animals.
         Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even pets. Animal rights can also be violated when it comes to human destruction of animal habitats. This negatively impacts the ability of animals to lead full lives of their choosing.

Internet:<thehumaneleague.org>  (adapted).
Considering the ideas and linguistic aspects of the text above, judge the item below.The fragment “of the fact” (third sentence of the first paragraph), can be deleted without affecting the meaning or correctness of the original text.
  1. CCerto
  2. EErrado
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoC — Certo

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Interpretação textual – Redundância

✅ CERTO. O fragmento “of the fact” pode ser suprimido sem prejuízo ao significado ou à correção gramatical, pois a expressão “aware of the fact that” é redundante: “aware that” já transmite a mesma ideia de consciência de um fato. A terceira frase do primeiro parágrafo diz: “The animal rights movement strives to make the public aware of the fact that animals are sensitive...”. Se retirarmos “of the fact”, a frase passa a “aware that animals are...”, construção perfeitamente aceitável em inglês e com o mesmo sentido. Portanto, a afirmação está correta.

NÃO CAIA NESSA!

O candidato pode pensar que a remoção alteraria o sentido porque “fact” parece enfatizar a veracidade, mas em inglês “aware that” já implica conhecimento de um fato. A banca testa a capacidade de perceber redundâncias desnecessárias.

Gabarito: Certo.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce176270