Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2024

InglêsAspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects
Código
ce176271
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MMA
Ano
2024
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Analista Ambiental
Text CB1A8

        The idea of giving rights to animals has long been contentious, but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights advocates want to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public aware of the fact that animals are sensitive, emotional, and intelligent beings who deserve dignity and respect. But first, it’s important to understand what the term “animal rights” really means.
         Animal rights are moral principles grounded in the belief that non-human animals deserve the ability to live as they wish, without being subjected to the desires of human beings. At the core of animal rights is autonomy, which is another way of saying choice. In many countries, human rights are enshrined to protect certain freedoms, such as the right to expression, freedom from torture, and access to democracy. Of course, these choices are constrained depending on social locations like race, class, and gender, but generally speaking, human rights safeguard the basic tenets of what makes human lives worth living. Animal rights aim to do something similar, only for non-human animals.
         Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even pets. Animal rights can also be violated when it comes to human destruction of animal habitats. This negatively impacts the ability of animals to lead full lives of their choosing.

Internet:<thehumaneleague.org>  (adapted).
Considering the ideas and linguistic aspects of the text above, judge the item below.We can infer from the text that even the act of eating animals may be considered infringe animal rights.
  1. CCerto
  2. EErrado
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoC — Certo

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Interpretação de texto – Inferência

✅ CERTO. O texto afirma que os direitos animais se opõem diretamente à exploração animal, que inclui o uso de animais para alimentação. Logo, o ato de comer animais pode ser considerado uma violação dos direitos animais, conforme o item infere.

The Humane League (adaptado): "Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even pets."

O trecho explicita que a exploração para alimentação está no centro da oposição aos direitos animais, confirmando a inferência do item. A palavra "even" no item ("even the act of eating animals") está de acordo com o texto, que lista a alimentação como um dos exemplos de exploração.

Gabarito: Certo.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce176271