Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2024

InglêsAspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects
Código
ce176273
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MMA
Ano
2024
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Analista Ambiental
Text CB1A8

        The idea of giving rights to animals has long been contentious, but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights advocates want to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public aware of the fact that animals are sensitive, emotional, and intelligent beings who deserve dignity and respect. But first, it’s important to understand what the term “animal rights” really means.
         Animal rights are moral principles grounded in the belief that non-human animals deserve the ability to live as they wish, without being subjected to the desires of human beings. At the core of animal rights is autonomy, which is another way of saying choice. In many countries, human rights are enshrined to protect certain freedoms, such as the right to expression, freedom from torture, and access to democracy. Of course, these choices are constrained depending on social locations like race, class, and gender, but generally speaking, human rights safeguard the basic tenets of what makes human lives worth living. Animal rights aim to do something similar, only for non-human animals.
         Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even pets. Animal rights can also be violated when it comes to human destruction of animal habitats. This negatively impacts the ability of animals to lead full lives of their choosing.

Internet:<thehumaneleague.org>  (adapted).
Considering the ideas and linguistic aspects of the text above, judge the item below.The discussion about giving rights to animals has been prevalent lately.
  1. CCerto
  2. EErrado
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoE — Errado

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Compreensão de texto – Aspecto temporal

❌ ERRADO. O item afirma que a discussão sobre dar direitos aos animais tem sido prevalente ultimamente, mas o texto diz que essa ideia "has long been contentious" (é controversa há muito tempo). Portanto, o item não se sustenta, pois o texto indica que o debate não é recente, e sim antigo.

A frase "has long been contentious" significa que a controvérsia existe há muito tempo, não que se tornou prevalente apenas recentemente. Logo, a afirmação está em desacordo com o conteúdo do texto.

NÃO CAIA NESSA!

A banca troca a ideia de "longo tempo" por "recente" – o candidato pode ler rapidamente e achar que ambos são compatíveis, mas o texto enfatiza a antiguidade da discussão, não a atualidade.

Gabarito: Errado.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce176273