Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2026

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
ce229894
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
TCU
Ano
2026
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Auditor Federal de Controle Externo - Área de Controle Externo/ Orientação: Auditoria de Tecnologia da Informação
        Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in the public sector that is significantly improving financial accountability and governance. The implementation of AI technologies can lead to improved decision making, more efficient operations, and increased accountability and transparency in financial operations. For example, the integrity of financial systems has been notably enhanced through the application of artificial intelligence in areas such as fraud detection, regulatory compliance, and risk assessment. However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems, as well as ethical considerations and problems related to data governance. Furthermore, integrating artificial intelligence within the public sector needs a comprehensive strategy that involves ethical considerations and scientific progress.

        It is important to address potential issues that are related to algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and accountability in order to build public trust in government operations that are driven by AI. Therefore, it is important to develop ethical guidelines and governance frameworks that guide the appropriate use of artificial intelligence in financial decision making, ensuring that these technologies serve the public good. The relationship between AI, financial responsibility, and governance is a key area for the formulation of policies, as governments seek to use the potential of AI while maintaining democratic values and public trust.

Ceray Aldemir and Tuğba Uçma Uysal. Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and
Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges.
Internet: < www.mdpi.com> (adapted). 
Concerning the previous text, judge the following item.In the first paragraph of the text, the phrase “these systems” (in the fourth sentence) is referring back to both “financial systems” (in the third sentence) and “artificial intelligence systems” (in the fourth sentence).
  1. CCerto
  2. EErrado
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoE — Errado

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Referência pronominal – Coesão textual

Gabarito: E (Errado). O item afirma que a expressão “these systems” (quarta frase) remete tanto a “financial systems” (terceira frase) quanto a “artificial intelligence systems” (quarta frase), mas a leitura atenta do texto mostra que ela se refere apenas a “artificial intelligence systems”.

Na terceira frase, o texto menciona “the integrity of financial systems” e, na sequência, a quarta frase inicia com “However, the implementation of artificial intelligence systems also introduces some challenges, including the need for strong frameworks to ensure accountability and trust in these systems”. O pronome “these” (estes) + “systems” retoma o termo imediatamente anterior no mesmo período, “artificial intelligence systems”. Não há coesão que ligue “these systems” a “financial systems”, pois o foco da frase mudou para os sistemas de IA. Portanto, a afirmação está incorreta.

✅ Errado – a referência é apenas a “artificial intelligence systems”.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce229894