Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — FGV 2023

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
fg070000
Banca
FGV
Órgão
SME - SP
Ano
2023
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Professor de Ensino Fundamental II e Médio - Inglês

Text I

Nurturing Multimodalism


    […]

   New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.

   The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.

    Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.


Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In: CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter acies_in_ELT 

In the 2nd paragraph, the pronoun in “Instant messaging systems […] provide as natural a medium for communicating to them” refers to
  1. Aadults.
  2. Bteachers.
  3. Cchildren.
  4. Dprofessionals.
  5. Ebaby-boomers.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoC — children.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Referência pronominal – leitura de texto

Gabarito: letra C. O pronome "them", no trecho "Instant messaging systems […] provide as natural a medium for communicating to them", refere-se a "children" (crianças), conforme o contexto do segundo parágrafo. O texto afirma que o universo digital é intuitivo para as crianças, e que sistemas de mensagem instantânea são tão naturais para elas quanto o telefone foi para a geração baby-boomer.

"Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation."

Alternativa A — ❌ Incorreta

"Adults" (adultos) são mencionados no parágrafo como aqueles que acham as novas comunicações digitais "baffling and confronting" (desconcertantes e desafiadoras), não como o antecedente do pronome.

Alternativa B — ❌ Incorreta

"Teachers" (professores) aparecem no primeiro parágrafo e depois no final do segundo, mas não são o alvo do pronome nesta frase específica.

Alternativa C — ✅ Correta ⟵ GABARITO

O texto descreve as crianças como "intuitive to children" e que "children do not" achar as novas formas de comunicação confusas. A frase seguinte usa "them" para retomar "children", estabelecendo a comparação com a geração baby-boomer.

Alternativa D — ❌ Incorreta

"Professionals" (profissionais) não são mencionados no segundo parágrafo; o texto fala de "teachers" e "learners", mas não de profissionais em geral.

Alternativa E — ❌ Incorreta

"Baby-boomers" são citados como termo de comparação: "as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation". O pronome "them" não se refere a eles, mas ao grupo que está sendo comparado (as crianças).

Gabarito: letra C

Link permanente: /questoes/fg070000