Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — FGV 2025

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
fg107943
Banca
FGV
Órgão
CPRM
Ano
2025
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Analista em Geociências - Letras
READ TEXT I AND ANSWER THE  QUESTION:

TEXT I

Products and dynamics of lava-snow explosions: The 16 March 2017 explosion at Mount Etna, Italy

Abstract

Volcanic hazards associated with lava flows advancing on snow cover are often underrated, although sudden explosions related to different processes of lava-snow/ice contact can occur rapidly and are only preceded by small, easily underrated precursors. On 16 March 2017, during a mildly effusive and explosive eruption at Mount Etna, Italy, a slowly advancing lava lobe interacted with the snow cover to produce a sudden, brief sequence of explosions. White vapor, brown ash, and coarse material were suddenly ejected, and the products struck a group of people, injuring some of them. The proximal deposit formed a continuous mantle of ash, lapilli, and decimeter-sized bombs, while the ballistic material travelled up to 200 m from the lava edge. The deposit was estimated to have a mass of 7.1 ± 0.8 × 104 kg, which corresponds to a volume of 32.0 ± 3.6 m3 of lava being removed by the explosion. Data related to the texture and morphology of the ejected clasts were used to constrain a model of lava-snow interaction. The results suggest that the mechanism causing the explosions was the progressive build-up of pressure due to vapor accumulation under the lava flow, while no evidence was found for the occurrence of fuel-coolant interaction processes. Although these low-intensity explosions are not particularly frequent, the data set collected provides, for the first time, quantitative information about the processes involved and the associated hazard and suggests that mitigation measures should be established to prevent potentially dramatic accidents at worldwide volcanoes frequented by tourists and with fairly easy access, such as Etna.

Source: GSA Bulletin (2024) 136 (5-6): 2325–2342. Available at https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/136/5- 6/2325/628546/Products-and-dynamics-of-lava-snow-explosions-The
Based on Text I, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F).I) The eruption resulted in no casualties.II) Fragments were launched high above the edge of the lava.III) Fuel and coolant interaction caused the explosion at Mount Etna.The statements are, respectively
  1. AT, F, T.
  2. BF, F, T.
  3. CF, T, F.
  4. DF, T, T.
  5. ET, T, F.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoC — F, T, F.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Interpretação de Texto – Lava-snow explosion at Mount Etna

Gabarito: alternativa C (F, T, F). A sequência correta é Falso, Verdadeiro, Falso, conforme análise do Texto I.

Análise das afirmações

I) The eruption resulted in no casualties.Falso. O texto afirma que "the products struck a group of people, injuring some of them" (linha 8). Houve feridos, caracterizando vítimas (casualties). Portanto, a afirmação é falsa.

II) Fragments were launched high above the edge of the lava.Verdadeiro. O texto menciona que "the ballistic material travelled up to 200 m from the lava edge" (linhas 9-10). O termo "ballistic" implica lançamento aéreo, e a distância horizontal de 200 m sugere que os fragmentos foram projetados para o alto, o que justifica a interpretação de "high above".

III) Fuel and coolant interaction caused the explosion at Mount Etna.Falso. O texto é explícito: "no evidence was found for the occurrence of fuel-coolant interaction processes" (linha 14). A causa da explosão foi o acúmulo de vapor sob o fluxo de lava, e não interação combustível-refrigerante.

Portanto, a sequência correta é F, T, F, correspondente à alternativa C.

Link permanente: /questoes/fg107943