Inglês · FGV · 2025 | Questão sqc-fg125668

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

Código: fg125668
Banca: FGV
Órgão: TCE-PI
Ano: 2025
Nível: Superior

Read Text II and answer the five questions that follow it

Text II

OpenAI’s GPT-4 Scores in the Top 1% of Creative Thinking

By Erik Guzik

Of all the forms of human intellect that one might expect artificial intelligence to emulate, few people would likely place creativity at the top of their list. Creativity is wonderfully mysterious—and frustratingly fleeting. It defines us as human beings—and seemingly defies the cold logic that lies behind the silicon curtain of machines. Yet, the use of AI for creative endeavors is now growing.

New AI tools like DALL-E and Midjourney are increasingly part of creative production, and some have started to win awards for their creative output. The growing impact is both social and economic—as just one example, the potential of AI to generate new, creative content is a defining flashpoint behind the Hollywood writers’ strike.

And if our recent study into the striking originality of AI is any indication, the emergence of AI-based creativity—along with examples of both its promise and peril—is likely just beginning.

When people are at their most creative, they’re responding to a need, goal, or problem by generating something new—a product or solution that didn’t previously exist.

In this sense, creativity is an act of combining existing resources — ideas, materials, knowledge — in a novel way that’s useful or gratifying. Quite often, the result of creative thinking is also surprising, leading to something the creator did not — and perhaps could not — foresee.

Our results?

GPT-4 scored in the top 1 percent of test-takers for the originality of its ideas. From our research, we believe this marks one of the first examples of AI meeting or exceeding the human ability for original thinking.

In short, we believe that AI models like GPT-4 are capable of producing ideas that people see as unexpected, novel, and unique. Other researchers are arriving at similar conclusions in their research of AI and creativity.

Adapted from https://singularityhub.com/2023/09/10/openais-gpt-4-scores-in-thetop-1-of-creative-thinking/

Based on Text II, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).

( ) The text opens by asserting that emulating human creativity has always been considered by everybody as a priority in AI projects.

( ) The outcome of creative thinking can be unpredictable at times.

( ) The author concludes that using AI for creative ventures is worth the effort.

The statements are, respectively,

AF – F – T.
BF – T – T.
CT – F – T.
DT – F – F.
ET – T – F.

Reading Comprehension – Text II (AI Creativity)

Gabarito: letra B. A sequência correta é F – T – T: a primeira afirmativa é falsa, a segunda é verdadeira e a terceira é verdadeira, conforme análise do texto.

Análise das afirmativas

1ª afirmativa — ❌ Falsa

O texto abre com "Of all the forms of human intellect that one might expect artificial intelligence to emulate, few people would likely place creativity at the top of their list." Isso indica que a criatividade não é considerada prioridade por muitos, contrariando a afirmação de que "sempre foi considerada por todos como prioridade".

2ª afirmativa — ✅ Verdadeira

O texto afirma: "Quite often, the result of creative thinking is also surprising, leading to something the creator did not — and perhaps could not — foresee." Isso comprova que o resultado pode ser imprevisível.

3ª afirmativa — ✅ Verdadeira

Embora não haja uma frase explícita "vale a pena", o autor conclui destacando o potencial e a originalidade da IA criativa: "we believe that AI models like GPT-4 are capable of producing ideas that people see as unexpected, novel, and unique." O tom positivo e a referência ao "promise and peril" indicam que o autor considera o esforço válido, o que é corroborado pelo gabarito oficial.

Conclusão: A sequência F – T – T corresponde à alternativa B.

Gabarito: letra B.