Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — FGV 2026

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
fg128377
Banca
FGV
Órgão
ALERJ
Ano
2026
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Especialista Legislativo - Nível IV - Relações Públicas (Institucionais)

Read the following text and answer the next five question.



The implications of a rapidly changing information ecosystem on how governments communicate 



    Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces. Indeed, the analysis of its role for policy and governance mechanisms is made urgent by shifts in the information ecosystem that have transformed the function over the past decade and raised important implications for democracy. The technological revolution that has connected the world through social media has given rise to online social movements and simplified the creation and sharing of content and data. Such changes have also facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation, contributed to undermining the role of traditional information gatekeepers, and have fundamentally changed how governments communicate. Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called “one-to-many” model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a “many-to-many” model. Anyone can be both a producer and a consumer of information, and anybody with an internet connection has the potential to engage with and influence public debates.


    Traditionally, governments had largely relied on traditional media to amplify official messages to reach citizens. With the advent of digital channels, this approach has gradually lost its primacy to direct institution-to-individual communication via online platforms that bypass traditional media. This shift has also enabled a broader scope for governments to communicate about more diverse policy issues targeted to more specific audiences, as traditional media tend to concentrate on “newsworthy” subjects and political affairs, often under-reporting less mainstream issues. The unprecedented volumes of data that promise to make communication ever more precise, combined with the direct, unmediated access to vast and diverse publics, are some of the opportunities and challenges that have emerged.


    At the same time, digital platforms have altered patterns in eople’s consumption of information and raised demands on their attention. The latter has become a resource that technology companies sell to advertisers. In turn, the design of online platforms and their algorithms, and the massive increase in the volume of information served to increase competition for what content people pay attention to, while making focus more superficial. As governments compete with all other information sources for the public’s attention, cognitive and psychological factors such as information overload can undermine the efficacy of even well-crafted content.


    Online and social media have also heightened the pace at which information travels, accelerated the news cycle, and enabled a wider range of actors to drive discussions on policy issues. Taken together, digital technologies have produced a complex information ecosystem that has made it more challenging for official messages to “cut through the noise”. Cumulatively, these changes require considerable adjustments to practices, public officials’ skills, and even to how communication is organised, if governments are to make the most of the digital transformation and ensure it can promote better governance. […]


    The ability for governments to use the communication function to promote constructive democratic spaces is critically threatened by widespread mis- and disinformation. When falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy, official messages are drowned out, creating significant challenges for public communicators to get key information out to all groups in society. Whether in the context of elections, health crises, migration or climate change, mis- and disinformation cast evidence and facts into doubt, sow distrust, and work against policy goals.



Adapted from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/ reports/2021/12/oecd-report-on-public-communication_b74311bc/22f8031c-en.pdf 


 


Based on the information provided by the text, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).( ) Public messages are detached from their environment.( ) The pervasiveness of “many-to-many” communication predates the turn of the century.( ) Innovations in technology have enabled the quick spread of inaccurate information.The statements are, respectively:
  1. AT – T – F
  2. BT – F – F
  3. CT – F – T
  4. DF – T – F
  5. EF – F – T
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoE — F – F – T

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Reading Comprehension – True/False Statements

Gabarito: letra E — sequência F – F – T (Falso, Falso, Verdadeiro). A primeira afirmação é desmentida já no início do texto, que afirma que a comunicação pública não ocorre no vácuo; a segunda inverte a cronologia do modelo de comunicação; a terceira é confirmada diretamente pelo texto.

Análise das afirmações

1ª afirmação: "Public messages are detached from their environment."Falsa. O texto diz exatamente o contrário: "Public communication does not happen in a vacuum: the context in which it occurs is core to understanding the challenges and opportunities it faces." Portanto, as mensagens públicas estão profundamente ligadas ao seu ambiente.

2ª afirmação: "The pervasiveness of 'many-to-many' communication predates the turn of the century."Falsa. O texto afirma que, até o início dos anos 2000, prevalecia o modelo "one-to-many". A mudança para o modelo "many-to-many" é posterior: "Whereas until the early 2000s a so-called 'one-to-many' model of communication prevailed, this has shifted today to a 'many-to-many' model." Logo, o modelo many-to-many não predata a virada do século; ao contrário, é um fenômeno mais recente.

3ª afirmação: "Innovations in technology have enabled the quick spread of inaccurate information."Verdadeira. O texto afirma que as mudanças tecnológicas "facilitated, however, the spread of mis- and disinformation" e que "falsehoods spread extensively and rapidly on issues of public policy". Portanto, a inovação tecnológica de fato permitiu a rápida propagação de informações imprecisas.

Conclusão: A sequência correta é F – F – T, correspondente à alternativa E.

NÃO CAIA NESSA!

A banca inverte a linha do tempo para confundir. Muitos candidatos podem associar "many-to-many" à internet, que começou no final do século XX, mas o texto claramente delimita que o modelo anterior (one-to-many) vigorou até os anos 2000. A afirmativa 2 sugere que o modelo atual já era predominante antes, quando na verdade ele é uma mudança recente. Fique atento aos marcadores temporais explícitos no texto.

Gabarito: letra E

Link permanente: /questoes/fg128377