Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — IDESG 2025
InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Código
- qg525146
- Banca
- IDESG
- Órgão
- Prefeitura de Alto Rio Novo - ES
- Ano
- 2025
- Nível
- Superior
- Cargo
- PEB-II - Professor de Língua Estrangeira Moderna - Inglês
Read the text and answer the question.Schools often adopt digital platforms quickly because purchase cycles reward novelty and visibility. Login rates and dashboard activity are paraded as evidence of impact, even when teachers report that the dashboards narrow what counts as learning. A teacher who resists a mandated platform is frequently labeled a laggard. Yet hesitation can be prudent: when pacing is dictated by a metric, attention may shift from understanding to what the metric can capture. The argument here is not to reject technology. It is to renegotiate control—who sets the goals, which data matter, and what should remain off the record. Only then can professional judgment act as a productive constraint, preventing means from swallowing ends.Which statement best captures the author’s central claim?
- AEdtech reliably improves learning when usage is measured frequently; teachers should align instruction with dashboard pacing so that measurement and pedagogy converge and accountability replaces professional judgment.
- BResistance to mandated platforms mainly reflects technophobia; if goals are clear, attention metrics are a sound proxy for understanding and adoption can proceed without renegotiating control over data and pacing.
- CTechnology should be adopted only after control is renegotiated so that data serve pedagogy; professional judgment must limit what metrics can dictate, because visibility is not the same as understanding.
- DBecause platforms inevitably displace attention from learning, schools should avoid dashboards and postpone adoption indefinitely; the safest policy is to reject most new tools outright.