Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — IF-PI 2026
InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Código
- qg710004
- Banca
- IF-PI
- Órgão
- IF-PI
- Ano
- 2026
- Nível
- Superior
- Cargo
- Professor EBTT - Ingles
Regarding the modal verbs used in the context of the passage by Cope and Kalantzis (2000), it is correct to state that:
- AThe use of might in “What we might term ‘mere literacy’ …” highlights an epistemic possibility and expresses terminological caution, through which the authors merely suggest a possible naming rather than imposing a conceptual label.
- BIn the excerpt “the assumption that we can actually discern and describe correct usage,” the modal can expresses a lack of human ability to identify and describe the “correct” use of language.
- CThe semantic orientation of must in the excerpt “Such a view of language must characteristically translate into a more or less authoritarian kind of pedagogy” is one of obligation and indicates that viewing language as a stable system of rules does not translate into an authoritarian pedagogy.
- DThe use of may in the excerpt “the visual mode of representation may be much more powerful…” helps to universalize the statement, expressing a possibility that is independent of the cultural context in question.
- EForming a hypothetical modal construction, would is associated with the expression be able to in the excerpt “than ‘mere literacy’ would ever be able to allow” to support the claim that “mere literacy” allows the mentioned mode of representation.