Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — VUNESP 2025

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
vu107450
Banca
VUNESP
Órgão
SEDUC-SP
Ano
2025
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Professor de Educação Básica II - Inglês
The experience Gouin goes through can be said to confirm views and theories which state that the systematic learning of grammar
  1. Ais the adequate starting point for beginners, but insufficient at more advanced stages.
  2. Bwill be successful as long as the learner employs the right resources for it.
  3. Cis useless if the learner’s goal is to speak fluently in the foreign language.
  4. Dcan be frustrating if it does not really lead to the mastering of the language rules.
  5. Ewill be meaningful and productive depending on the purpose of the learner for it.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoE — will be meaningful and productive depending on the purpose of the learner for it.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Gouin's experience and systematic grammar learning

Gabarito: letra E. Gouin's failed attempt to understand spoken German after ten days of isolated grammar study confirms the view that systematic grammar learning is only meaningful and productive depending on the learner's purpose. The text explicitly shows that his method, which worked for reading Latin and Greek, did not transfer to oral comprehension, supporting the idea that the effectiveness of grammar study is purpose-dependent.

Alternative A — ❌ Incorrect

The text does not suggest that grammar is an adequate starting point; on the contrary, Gouin's approach failed entirely in his first classroom attempt. The alternative overstates the value of grammar as a starting point.

Alternative B — ❌ Incorrect

Gouin had a grammar book and dictionary (the "right resources" according to his method), yet his learning was not successful. Thus, resources alone do not guarantee success.

Alternative C — ❌ Incorrect

Gouin's goal was to understand spoken German (fluency in listening), and his grammar study was useless for that specific goal. However, the alternative says "useless if the learner’s goal is to speak fluently," which is too narrow and absolute; the text only shows failure in listening comprehension, not speaking. Moreover, "useless" is an extreme claim not fully supported.

Alternative D — ❌ Incorrect

Gouin's experience was indeed frustrating, but the alternative focuses on "not really lead to the mastering of the language rules." Gouin likely mastered the rules (he studied them for ten days), yet still could not understand. The frustration stemmed from inability to apply rules in real communication, not from failing to master them.

Alternative E — ✅ Correct ⟵ GABARITO

The text illustrates that systematic grammar learning, as Gouin practiced, may be meaningful and productive for certain purposes (e.g., reading Latin) but not for others (e.g., understanding spoken German). This aligns with theories that the effectiveness of grammar study depends on the learner's purpose.

Gabarito: letra E

Link permanente: /questoes/vu107450