Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Adjetivos | Adjectives — VUNESP 2026

InglêsAdjetivos | Adjectives
Código
vu117422
Banca
VUNESP
Órgão
Prefeitura de Osasco - SP
Ano
2026
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Professor Adjunto de Educação Básica II - Inglês

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:


    So what languages do I know? I speak English, Spanish, Portuguese, a little French, and a little in a few others. But I would be a bit uncomfortable to say that I ‘know’ all of these languages. The reason for my discomfort is that language learning is such a slow, piece-by-piece process that it is hard to tell when someone has finally ‘arrived’.


    In fact, this idea of ‘arriving’ in language is misguided. Language, you see, is more of a journey than a destination, and most learners never feel comfortable saying they have arrived when asked about how much they know. This is especially true because, as in all educational pursuits, the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know.


    To illustrate, many of my Asian English learning students studying here in Arizona, U.S., are quite proficient in English. However, when people ask them if they speak English, here are the answers I most often hear:


    “I speak okay.”

    “I’m not so good.”

    “I don’t know.”


    The truth is that even these excellent English speakers often feel the distance between them and native-like proficiency. They have accents, they do not know certain words, and they constantly second-guess their grammar. The question “Do you speak a language?” comes out sounding, in their ears, a lot like “Have you mastered the language?”


    So how can my foreign students, who by all accounts are doing amazing things in the United States, still feel like they have not arrived? The truth is this: when we focus on mastering a language - perfect pronunciation, complete command of the vocabulary, ability to speak in any and every possible situation -, we are always going to feel insufficient, because by that measure, we all fall short. This way of learning a language is exhausting. A better question than “Do you know the language?” is this: “In the language you are learning, are you creating friendships and experiences?” What I am suggesting is that learners reframe their perspectives. If they are fueled by meeting others, trying new things, and making memories and friendships for themselves, they have a great shot.


    I believe that language learning is, at its core, about relationships and experiences – about connecting and learning from those connections. It is my belief that every story (even those who fail) can teach us something about language learning.


(DIXON, S. The language learner guidebook: powerful tools to help you conquer any language. [S.l.]: Wayzgoose, 2018. Adaptado)

The construction “the more you learn, the more you are aware of what you do not know” (paragraph 2) describes a relationship in which two elements change in proportion to each other.A correct example of such double comparative is found in alternative:
  1. AThe more autonomous the language learner is, the farther they will probably get.
  2. BThe less hurriedly something is done, the less mistakes tend to be made.
  3. CThe least the attention given to an assignment, the worst the result.
  4. DThe fewer effort and time you dedicate to your learning, the fewer job opportunities you’ll find later in life.
  5. EThe longest the journey, the greatest the happiness in arriving at the destination.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoA — The more autonomous the language learner is, the farther they will probably get.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Double Comparatives – Estrutura "the more..., the more..."

Gabarito: letra A. A frase do texto "the more you learn, the more you are aware" exemplifica a construção do double comparative (comparativo duplo), em que duas grandezas variam proporcionalmente. A única alternativa que reproduz corretamente essa estrutura — com dois comparativos — é a A. As demais incorrem em erros de superlativos no lugar de comparativos ou uso inadequado de fewer/less.

A regra é: The + comparative adjective/adverb, the + comparative adjective/adverb. O comparativo pode ser formado com more/less + adjetivo/adjetivo longo, ou com o sufixo -er para adjetivos curtos, ou ainda com formas irregulares (ex.: better, worse, farther).

Alternativa

Estrutura "the + comparativo, the + comparativo"

Correto?

Erro(s) identificado(s)

A

the more autonomous... the farther

Correta (Gabarito)

Nenhum. Comparativos regulares e irregulares usados corretamente.

B

the less hurriedly... the less mistakes

❌ Incorreta

Less usado com substantivo contável (mistakes); o correto seria fewer mistakes.

C

the least... the worst

❌ Incorreta

Least e worst são superlativos, não comparativos. O correto seria the less... the worse.

D

the fewer effort and time... the fewer job opportunities

❌ Incorreta

Fewer usado com substantivos incontáveis (effort, time); o correto seria less effort and time.

E

the longest... the greatest

❌ Incorreta

Longest e greatest são superlativos, não comparativos. O correto seria the longer... the greater.

Alternativa A — ✅ Correta ⟵ GABARITO

"The more autonomous the language learner is, the farther they will probably get."

Correto. More autonomous é o comparativo de autonomous (adjetivo longo) e farther é o comparativo irregular de far. A estrutura está perfeita: the more autonomous... the farther...

Alternativa B — ❌ Incorreta

"The less hurriedly something is done, the less mistakes tend to be made."

Há dois problemas: (1) hurriedly é advérbio, o comparativo less hurriedly é aceitável, mas (2) mistakes é substantivo contável, portanto o correto seria fewer mistakes, não less mistakes. Além disso, espera-se paralelismo: the less hurriedly (advérbio) e the fewer mistakes (substantivo) — mas o erro principal é o uso de less com contável.

Alternativa C — ❌ Incorreta

"The least the attention given to an assignment, the worst the result."

Least e worst são superlativos, não comparativos. A forma comparativa correta seria the less attention... the worse the result. A estrutura exige comparativos, não superlativos.

Alternativa D — ❌ Incorreta

"The fewer effort and time you dedicate to your learning, the fewer job opportunities you'll find later in life."

Effort e time são substantivos incontáveis, portanto devem ser quantificados com less, não fewer. O correto seria the less effort and time... the fewer job opportunities. O segundo fewer está correto (opportunities é contável), mas o primeiro está errado.

Alternativa E — ❌ Incorreta

"The longest the journey, the greatest the happiness in arriving at the destination."

Novamente, longest e greatest são superlativos. A forma correta é the longer the journey, the greater the happiness. A preposição in arriving também é estranha, mas o erro principal é o uso de superlativos.

NÃO CAIA NESSA!

Em provas de inglês, ao identificar um double comparative, lembre-se: a estrutura é sempre the + comparative (não superlative) e, para substantivos contáveis, use fewer; para incontáveis, less. Treine reconhecer essas armadilhas.

Gabarito: letra A.

Link permanente: /questoes/vu117422