Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2023

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
ce156872
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MRE
Ano
2023
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Oficial de Chancelaria
Text 1A2-II


       I have often thought how interesting a magazine paper might be written by any author who would—that is to say, who could—detail, step by step, the processes by which any one of his compositions attained its ultimate point of completion. Why such a paper has never been given to the world, I am much at a loss to say—but, perhaps, the authorial vanity has had more to do with the omission than any one other cause. Most writers—poets in especial—prefer having it understood that they compose by a species of fine frenzy—an ecstatic intuition—and would positively shudder at letting the public take a peep behind the scenes, at the elaborate and vacillating crudities of thought—at the true purposes seized only at the last moment—at the innumerable glimpses of idea that arrived not at the maturity of full view—at the fully-matured fancies discarded in despair as unmanageable—at the cautious selections and rejections—at the painful erasures and interpolations—in a word, at the wheels and pinions—the tackle for scene-shifting—the step-ladders, and demon-traps—the cock’s feathers, the red paint and the black patches, which, in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, constitute the properties of the literary histrio.

        I am aware, on the other hand, that the case is by no means common, in which an author is at all in condition to retrace the steps by which his conclusions have been attained. In general, suggestions, having arisen pell-mell are pursued and forgotten in a similar manner.

       For my own part, I have neither sympathy with the repugnance alluded to, nor, at any time, the least difficulty in recalling to mind the progressive steps of any of my compositions, and, since the interest of an analysis or reconstruction, such as I have considered a desideratum, is quite independent of any real or fancied interest in the thing analysed, it will not be regarded as a breach of decorum on my part to show the modus operandi by which some one of my own works was put together. I select The Raven as most generally known. It is my design to render it manifest that no one point in its composition is referable either to accident or intuition—that the work proceeded step by step, to its completion, with the precision and rigid consequence of a mathematical problem.

Edgar Allan Poe. The Philosophy of Composition, 1846 (adapted)
In text 1A2-II, Poe affirms that
  1. Awhen writing The Raven, he had to resort to the exact sciences.
  2. Bsuggestions about writing are rejected because they make authors feel confused.
  3. Cinterest in his creative process does not imply interest in his literary works.
  4. Dhe decided to describe his own creative process after requests of his readers.
  5. Eit is common for authors to be able to describe their creative processes.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoC — interest in his creative process does not imply interest in his literary works.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

The Philosophy of Composition — Reading Comprehension

Gabarito: letra C. Poe afirma explicitamente que o interesse em uma análise do processo criativo é independente do interesse na obra analisada. O trecho central é:

"since the interest of an analysis or reconstruction, such as I have considered a desideratum, is quite independent of any real or fancied interest in the thing analysed"

Isso valida a alternativa C: o interesse no processo criativo não implica interesse nas obras literárias.

NÃO CAIA NESSA!

A alternativa A usa uma metáfora de Poe ("precisão e consequência rígida de um problema matemático") e tenta fazê-la parecer literal — ele não recorreu às ciências exatas, apenas comparou seu método a um problema matemático. Cuidado com interpretações literais de figuras de linguagem.

Alternativa A — ❌ Incorreta

Poe compara seu método à precisão de um problema matemático, mas não afirma ter "recorrido às ciências exatas". A expressão é metafórica.

Alternativa B — ❌ Incorreta

O texto diz que sugestões surgem "pell-mell" e são "perseguidas e esquecidas", não que são rejeitadas porque causam confusão.

Alternativa C — ✅ Correta ⟵ GABARITO

Conforme a citação acima, Poe declara que o interesse na análise é independente do interesse na obra analisada.

Alternativa D — ❌ Incorreta

Não há menção a pedidos de leitores. Poe diz que "muitas vezes pensei como seria interessante" escrever tal artigo, por iniciativa própria.

Alternativa E — ❌ Incorreta

Poe afirma justamente o contrário: "the case is by no means common, in which an author is at all in condition to retrace the steps" — não é comum autores conseguirem descrever seu processo criativo.

Conclusão: Apenas a alternativa C está correta. O gabarito é a letra C.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce156872