Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2023

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
ce156874
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MRE
Ano
2023
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Oficial de Chancelaria
Text 1A2-II


       I have often thought how interesting a magazine paper might be written by any author who would—that is to say, who could—detail, step by step, the processes by which any one of his compositions attained its ultimate point of completion. Why such a paper has never been given to the world, I am much at a loss to say—but, perhaps, the authorial vanity has had more to do with the omission than any one other cause. Most writers—poets in especial—prefer having it understood that they compose by a species of fine frenzy—an ecstatic intuition—and would positively shudder at letting the public take a peep behind the scenes, at the elaborate and vacillating crudities of thought—at the true purposes seized only at the last moment—at the innumerable glimpses of idea that arrived not at the maturity of full view—at the fully-matured fancies discarded in despair as unmanageable—at the cautious selections and rejections—at the painful erasures and interpolations—in a word, at the wheels and pinions—the tackle for scene-shifting—the step-ladders, and demon-traps—the cock’s feathers, the red paint and the black patches, which, in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, constitute the properties of the literary histrio.

        I am aware, on the other hand, that the case is by no means common, in which an author is at all in condition to retrace the steps by which his conclusions have been attained. In general, suggestions, having arisen pell-mell are pursued and forgotten in a similar manner.

       For my own part, I have neither sympathy with the repugnance alluded to, nor, at any time, the least difficulty in recalling to mind the progressive steps of any of my compositions, and, since the interest of an analysis or reconstruction, such as I have considered a desideratum, is quite independent of any real or fancied interest in the thing analysed, it will not be regarded as a breach of decorum on my part to show the modus operandi by which some one of my own works was put together. I select The Raven as most generally known. It is my design to render it manifest that no one point in its composition is referable either to accident or intuition—that the work proceeded step by step, to its completion, with the precision and rigid consequence of a mathematical problem.

Edgar Allan Poe. The Philosophy of Composition, 1846 (adapted)
According to Edgar Allan Poe’s point of view, portrayed in text 1A2-II, behind the scenes of writing,
  1. Awell-developed ideas may be impossible for the author to manage.
  2. Bthe author has to be wise to choose the appropriate tools for his creative process.
  3. Ccrude thoughts are written and then improved despite the author’s hesitation.
  4. Dit is difficult for the author to choose from the numerous ideas that mature.
  5. Elast-minute ideas usually have to be improved for the author to keep them.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoA — well-developed ideas may be impossible for the author to manage.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

The Philosophy of Composition – Reading Comprehension

Gabarito: letra A. Segundo Poe, ideias bem desenvolvidas podem ser descartadas por serem incontroláveis, conforme indicado no trecho: “the fully‑matured fancies discarded in despair as unmanageable”. A alternativa A capta exatamente essa ideia.

Alternativa A — ✅ Correta ⟵ GABARITO

O texto afirma que “as fully‑matured fancies [são] discarded in despair as unmanageable”, ou seja, ideias já maduras podem ser abandonadas porque o autor não consegue lidar com elas. A frase “well‑developed ideas may be impossible for the author to manage” é uma paráfrase direta desse trecho.

Alternativa B — ❌ Incorreta

A alternativa sugere que o autor precisa ser sábio para escolher as ferramentas adequadas. O texto menciona “cautious selections and rejections”, mas não impõe uma qualidade de “sabedoria” – apenas descreve um processo meticuloso. Não há evidência textual que a sustente.

Alternativa C — ❌ Incorreta

A opção afirma que pensamentos crus são escritos e depois melhorados apesar da hesitação. O texto menciona “elaborate and vacillating crudities of thought” e o “shudder” dos autores em mostrar essas crudezas, mas não diz que elas são escritas e melhoradas. Pelo contrário, muitas são descartadas.

Alternativa D — ❌ Incorreta

Diz que é difícil para o autor escolher entre as numerosas ideias que amadurecem. O texto fala em “innumerable glimpses of idea that arrived not at the maturity” e “fully‑matured fancies discarded”, mas não aborda uma dificuldade de escolha – o autor simplesmente descarta algumas ideias, sem mencionar um processo de seleção difícil.

Alternativa E — ❌ Incorreta

Afirma que ideias de última hora geralmente precisam ser melhoradas para serem mantidas. O texto menciona “the true purposes seized only at the last moment”, mas não implica que essas ideias sejam melhoradas; elas simplesmente são capturadas no último instante. Não há menção a melhoria.

Conclusão: A única alternativa que encontra respaldo literal no texto é a A.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce156874