Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Verbos | Verbs — CESPE / CEBRASPE 2026

InglêsVerbos | Verbs
Código
ce226459
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
Instituto Rio Branco
Ano
2026
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Diplomata (Terceiro Secretário)

        The claim to reason or rationality is the ultimate validation of the affirmation and assertion of the human condition. Aristotle’s definition of man as "a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and the Amerindian. Little did he realise that his definition of "man" laid down the foundation for the struggle for reason between colonialists and colonized peoples.

        Aristotle’s definition of man was deeply inscribed in the social ethos of those communities and societies which undertook the so-called voyages of discovery apparently driven by innocent curiosity. It seems then that the entire process of decolonisation has upheld and not jettisoned the questionable belief that "man is a rational animal" was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian.

        The term African philosophy renders the idea that history repeats itself easy to believe. The term tends to revive innate skepticism on the one hand and to stimulate ingrained condescension on the other. The skeptic, unswervingly committed to the will to remain ignorant, is simply dismissive of any possibility let alone the probability of African philosophy. Impelled by the will to dominate, the condescendor is often ready to entertain the probability of African philosophy provided the judgement pertaining to the experience, knowledge and truth about African philosophy is recognised as the sole and exclusive right of the condescendor. The self-appointed heirs to the right to reason have thus established themselves as the producers of all knowledge and the only holders of the truth.


Mogobe B. Ramose. African philosophy through Ubuntu.

Harare, Zimbabwe: Mond Books Publishers, 2005, pp. 5-6 (adapted).

Considering the preceding text, judge the following item.At the end of the second paragraph, if the fragment "questionable belief" were replaced with questionable beliefs, the change would require "was" to be replaced with were for the sentence to remain grammatically correct.
  1. CCerto
  2. EErrado
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoE — Errado

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Interpretação gramatical – Sujeito e verbo em oração subordinada

❌ ERRADO. A afirmativa está incorreta porque o verbo "was" não é regido pelo substantivo "belief", mas sim pelo sujeito da oração subordinada introduzida por "that". No trecho original, "the questionable belief that 'man is a rational animal' was not spoken of the African and of the Amerindian", o verbo "was" concorda com o sujeito da oração subordinada, que é a citação "'man is a rational animal'" (tratada como entidade singular). Ao substituir "belief" por "beliefs", a oração principal passa a ter um núcleo plural, mas a oração subordinada permanece inalterada, mantendo seu próprio sujeito e verbo. Portanto, não há necessidade de alterar "was" para "were". A frase continuaria gramaticalmente correta com "was".

Frase original: "…the questionable belief that 'man is a rational animal' was not spoken…" Frase alterada: "…the questionable beliefs that 'man is a rational animal' was not spoken…" — ainda correta, pois "was" se refere à citação, não a "beliefs".

Gabarito: ERRADO.

Link permanente: /questoes/ce226459