Pular para o conteúdo principal

Questão de Inglês — Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension — FGV 2024

InglêsInterpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Código
fg084366
Banca
FGV
Órgão
EPE
Ano
2024
Nível
Superior
Cargo
Advogado
Text II


Examining the fluff that frustrates northern China



       Like most blizzards, it begins with just a few white wisps swirling about. Gradually the volume increases and the stuff starts to accumulate on the ground. During the heaviest downfalls the air is so thick with it as to impair visibility. But this is no winter scene. It is what happens every April across much of northern China, when poplar trees start giving off their cotton-like seed-pods.

     The phenomenon has already begun in Beijing. On April 8th an eddy of fluff balls wafted around the American treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, as she held a press conference in an embassy garden.

     To call this a nuisance is an understatement. In many people the fluff triggers allergies, asthma and other respiratory problems. Experts say the white balls—produced by the trees’ catkins—are not themselves allergenic, but that they distribute irritating pollen.

      They also clog rain gutters, drain pipes and car radiators. Worse, they pose a fire hazard. Officials have warned that the fuzz balls have a low ignition point and called for extreme caution on the part of smokers, welders or anyone inclined to burn them “out of curiosity”.

       China’s catkin problem is the unintended consequence of an old effort to improve the environment. Intensive tree planting began in the 1950s with the aim of ending the scourge of sandstorms caused by winds sweeping out of barren areas. The trees were also meant to firm up the soil and slow desertification. Poplar trees, along with willows, were selected because they are cheap, fast-growing and drought-resistant.

    In some ways the plan worked. Today sandstorms are less severe and the threat of desertification has faded. But the annual onslaught from catkins is another legacy. Female trees are the cotton-ball culprits. There are millions of them (poplar and willow) in Beijing alone.

    Authorities have sought to mitigate the mess. The simplest way is to spray water on the trees, turning the fluffy flyers into damp squibs. More advanced solutions involve “birth control”, or injecting female trees with chemicals that suppress catkin production. Another option is “gender-reassignment surgery”, in which branches on female trees are cut and replaced with male grafts. 

   But experts say that these efforts will take time. The good news is that the flurries of poplar fluff will only last for a few more weeks. The bad news is that wafts of willow fluff will then begin. 
From: https://www.economist.com/china/2024/04/18/examining-thefluff-that-frustrates-northern-china


“To call this a nuisance is an understatement” (3rd paragraph) means that the problem is seen by the author as a
  1. Apetty episode.
  2. Bsizable hassle.
  3. Cminor mishap.
  4. Dpointless event.
  5. Efleeting incident.
Revelar gabarito e comentário

GabaritoB — sizable hassle.

Comentário gerado por IA. É um apoio ao estudo, ancorado em fontes, mas pode conter imprecisões — confira sempre na fonte oficial (lei, súmula, edital e gabarito da banca). Encontrou um erro? Use “Reportar”.

Interpretação de vocabulário: "understatement"

Gabarito: letra B. A frase "To call this a nuisance is an understatement" indica que classificar o problema como mero incômodo (nuisance) é um eufemismo, pois o problema é muito mais grave. O autor, portanto, considera o problema um sizable hassle (transtorno considerável).

A expressão "understatement" significa dizer menos do que realmente é; logo, o problema é maior do que um simples aborrecimento. O texto descreve consequências sérias: alergias, entupimentos, risco de incêndio. A opção B é a única que capta essa gravidade.

Análise das alternativas:

Alternativa A — ❌ Incorreta

"Petty episode" (episódio insignificante) contraria o sentido de understatement, que sugere algo maior, não menor.

Alternativa B — ✅ Correta ⟵ GABARITO

"Sizable hassle" (transtorno considerável) corresponde ao tom do texto: o problema é grande o suficiente para merecer a expressão "understatement".

Alternativa C — ❌ Incorreta

"Minor mishap" (pequeno contratempo) minimiza o problema, oposto do que a frase indica.

Alternativa D — ❌ Incorreta

"Pointless event" (evento sem sentido) não se relaciona com a magnitude do problema; é uma característica irrelevante ao contexto.

Alternativa E — ❌ Incorreta

"Fleeting incident" (incidente passageiro) foca na duração, não na intensidade. A frase enfatiza a subestimação do problema, não sua brevidade.

PEGA ESSA DICA!

Em provas de inglês, desconfie de "understatement" e "overstatement". Faça a pergunta: "O autor acha que é pior ou melhor do que diz?" Se é understatement, a realidade é pior; se overstatement, é melhor. Isso guia a resposta.

Gabarito: letra B.

Link permanente: /questoes/fg084366